Sunday, 8 December 2013

Why is Microsoft so Worried about Google’s Chromebooks?

hp-chromebook-14-4
When you think Technology, you very often think of one of three companies: Google, Microsoft and Apple. Easily the biggest tech companies in the world, these mammoth corporations are vying every single day for a spot in your household — preferably more than one spot, as a matter of fact. However, when it comes down to it, there’s really one elephant in the room between these companies when it comes to playing nice with one another, and that’s Microsoft. Microsoft is responsible for some of the most important things to most people today. The Microsoft Windows OS (which is mostly down to Windows 7 and 8 / 8.1 these days), and Microsoft’s Office Suite, which comes in a variety of sizes and fashions for whatever needs you may have. Their Windows 8 Mobile OS, which runs on mostly Nokia devices (with some Samsung and HTC ones slapped in there) has potential, but is really having trouble getting off the ground with Android and iOS dominating the market internationally and within the United States.

“Scroogled”: The Dirty Sort of Advertising

Microsoft’s recent ad campaigns, named “Scroogled” is why they’re not exacting ‘playing fair’. We’ve seen this sort of advertising before, most recently involving Samsung’s ads for the “Next Big Thing” and making cheap (but funny) jabs at iPhone users waiting outside on long lines for the iPhone. However, in the case of Samsung and Apple, they were simply targeting customers and the silliness that was associated with the idea of waiting for hours outside a store for a phone that was presumably sub-par to the Galaxy.
When it comes to Microsoft’s advertising, it’s a little less docile. In fact, it just recently got its own branded merchandise to go along with it.The idea behind Scroogled is to instill fear in consumers over how Google uses their data: Targeted Advertising. Google takes information about the consumers that use their service, picking out key words and frequently used names, and targets advertisements at them — a fact that most users don’t very much care about, though Microsoft has made it the centerpiece of an escalating series of attacks. Here’s one of their older ones in regard to ‘Google’s App Store’:
The War on Chromebooks: Does it even make sense?Microsoft has chosen a new product to wage war on, and this time, they’ve brought in the big guns. The Chromebook, Google’s highly affordable and modestly successful laptop line that runes Chrome OS is in Microsoft’s sights, and they aren’t messing around – in fact, they’ve even given the Chromebook its own page on its Scroogled Website. But why? What makes the Chromebook so dangerous to Microsoft?They’re probably working off reports like this one by NPD that estimated Chromebooks actually snared 25% of the US market for laptops under $300. The thing that Microsoft doesn’t really get in this case is that this market is really no longer viable; it’s being taken up by tablets, actually. Another research firm, IDC, estimates that Samsung shipped about 652,000 Chromebooks worldwide in the Third Quarter. “Among other vendors Lenovo, Acer, and HP have shipped, but in tiny volume,” said IDC’s senior research analyst Rajani Singh. IDC only expects Chrome OS devices to reach 3 million units this year — that’s less than 1 percent of all PC sales. Chromebooks have dominated Amazon’s best seller charts in the US, but they haven’t exactly penetrated the global market as effectively.
Microsoft is scared, but should they be? Google and HP were forced to halt sales of the Chromebook 11 last month following complaints of chargers overheating, and it hasn’t even returned to shelves yet. One has to be worried about the possibility of this scheme of theirs backfiring — drawing more attention to the Chromebook than it would’ve originally received. Consumers will think “If it’s good enough for Microsoft to care about, maybe I should care about it too”. It’s contracting, yes, but it happens. ”Given Microsoft is currently losing the mobility war by a wide margin, they are turning to defending their laptop turf, and doing it by playing a strong offense…the downside is that by Microsoft going after Chromebooks with broadcast media, they are increasing general consumer awareness and familiarity for Chromebooks versus the more technically savvy who are buying Chromebooks,” says Patrick Moorhead, president and principal analyst at Moor Insights and Strategy.

What about Microsoft Office?

The Chromebooks themselves aren’t necessarily what Microsoft is worried about. One thing that people love about Google, is that they get tons of services for free. Maps, groups, email, but most importantly: Google Docs and Google Drive. These watered down Spreadsheet, Word and Powerpoint tools give the bare minimum to the user, allowing them to do simple edits and organizational changes for free. For many people, especially those that may not be able to afford the full price of Microsoft Office (or a yearly fee to use it at that), these programs can get them by. Google’s laptop operating system itself is just a modified version of its Chrome browser, running across PCs, Macs, iPads, and Android tablets — something that neither Windows nor Office is able to do just yet. Microsoft pushes Office a lot as a result.

scroogled
It’s very possible that Microsoft believes Office to be threatened by these low-cost, no-frills options that Google provides. And for a college student that’s writing up a quick something for their class in an hour, chances are they’d pick the free alternative if they needed to. But people need Office, and there has yet to be a more compelling solution available on the market — Microsoft shouldn’t worry too much.
When will we see the Scroogled Campaign stop? Sometime soon, maybe, or sometime in the future. I couldn’t really tell you, as it doesn’t necessarily seem to be working to either company’s advantage – or disadvantage for that matter.
What do you think about Microsoft’s latest Ads? Do you disagree with their methods, but agree with their message? Something else? Let us know in the Comments!

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

S4 rumours on the way

Start the Hypebeasting! Galaxy S5 To come with 4GB of RAM and 64-bit Exynos Chip


Samsung Galaxy 5 Render Concept























It’s never to early to start pushing out rumors of a new phone or tablet now is it? The Galaxy S5 isn’t due to be announced until next Spring, even though rumors are saying CES I highly doubt it. But we have been seeing rumors for the Galaxy S5 for about a month now. The latest rumor comes form a South Korean IT publication which reiterates that Samsung’s 64-bit Exynos processor is in the final stages of preparation before it enters the production line. This we already knew, but there’s some more information coming along with it this time. The name of this processor is going to be the 6-series. To differentiate from the Exynos 5 Octa which we currently have in many of their flagship devices in 2013. It would hint at the next line of Exynos processors as well as stand for 64-bit. Isn’t it nice how things work out sometimes.
There’s also another claim in that article. That is the Galaxy S5 will be packing 4GB of RAM. Man that’s a lot of RAM for a phone. Samsung just set the record for putting 3GB of RAM in the Galaxy Note 3, and last year they were the first to put 2GB of RAM in a smartphone with the Galaxy S3. The new Nexus 10 is also expected to have 3GB of RAM, so it wouldn’t be too hard to see all phones next year coming out with 3GB of RAM and then Samsung setting a new standard in 2014 with 4GB of RAM. Although I’d still rather Samsung, and everyone else, work on battery tech before 64-bit processors, octa-cores, and 4GB of RAM. I’m sure most of you will agree with me as well.
So 64-bit processor and 4GB of RAM, are we sure this isn’t for a low-end laptop? Are these rumors already tempting you to buy the Galaxy S5?

Friday, 25 October 2013


                                                   

        HTC One max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs LG G2




The HTC One Max is now a reality, and though product unveilings are usually a joyous occasion for the companies behind them and consumers both, it falls down on the latter to roll up their sleeves and start weighing the product's relative pros and cons. And though the general user experience is arguably only partially reliant on specs, they do remain an important reading that we go through every time a new flagship device enters the market.

Today, we're comparing three of the hottest flagships currently (and soon, in the case of the HTC One Max) available. Unlike the software side of things, where the trio features a wildly different value propositions, down under in the world of hardware, things are simpler and far less subjective. This, for example, means that we can easily call HTC on using a somewhat cheaper, slightly outdated chipset with the One Max – the Snapdragon 600 (Adreno 320), whereas the competition in the form of the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and the LG G2 has already moved to Snapdragon 800 with Adreno 330 graphics. On the other hand, at 5.9-inches, the HTC One Max has the largest screen real estate of the group, and this one should prove to live long enough to see more than a day of heavy usage, thanks to the large 3300mAh battery that HTC has snugged inside the One Max. While we're still at the topic of displays, it's probably also worth mentioning that the three contenders have all opted for a somewhat different display tech, each with its respective cons and pros – Super-LCD 3 for the One Max, Super AMOLED for the Note 3 and an LG IPS LCD panel for the G2. In our experience, Super-LCD 3 panels are a tad superior to some IPS LCDs (S-LCD3 is also an IPS panel) and also have a hand over AMOLEDs (though that gap has been significantly reduced with the Note 3).

Another rather more substantial win for the HTC One Max is its dedicated fingerprint sensor, not a first for Android or the world of smartphones as a whole, but definitely the first in a truly modern smartphone. Whether the said sensor delivers, however, remains to be seen (or tested).

With those in mind, and taking into account the extensive specs break-down we've provided for you below, do you think the HTC One Max will manage to sway consumers off rival propositions?

HTC One max vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs LG G2

DESIGN
OSAndroid (4.3) Sense 5.5 UIAndroid (4.3)Android (4.2.2)
Dimensions6.48 x 3.25 x 0.41 inches (164.5 x 82.5 x 10.29 mm)5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches (151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 mm)5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches (138.5 x 70.9 x 8.9 mm)
Weight7.65 oz (217 g)
the average is 4.5 oz (129 g)
5.93 oz (168 g)
the average is 4.5 oz (129 g)
5.04 oz (143 g)
the average is 4.5 oz (129 g)
Body materialAluminium  
Design featuresFingerprint sensorS Pen 
DISPLAY
Physical size6.0 inches5.7 inches5.2 inches
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels1080 x 1920 pixels1080 x 1920 pixels
Pixel density
367 ppi386 ppi423 ppi
Technology
S-LCD 3Super AMOLEDIPS LCD
Colors16 777 21616 777 21616 777 216
Peak brightness  450 cd/m2 (nit)
BATTERY
Talk time 25.00 hours
the average is 12 h (743 min)
 
Stand-by time 22.0 days (528 hours)
the average is 21 days (500 h)
 
Talk time (3G)25.00 hours
the average is 12 h (697 min)
21.00 hours
the average is 12 h (697 min)
 
Stand-by time (3G)24.4 days (585 hours)
the average is 19 days (463 h)
17.5 days (420 hours)
the average is 19 days (463 h)
 
Stand-by time (4G) 380.0 days (9120 hours)
the average is 50 days (1196 h)
 
Music playback 84.00 hours 
Video playback 13.00 hours 
Capacity3300 mAh3200 mAh3000 mAh
TypeLi - IonLi - IonLi - Polymer
Not user replaceableYes Yes
HARDWARE
System chip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064TQualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
Processor
Quad core, 1700 MHz, Krait 300Quad core, 2300 MHz, Krait 400Quad core, 2260 MHz, Krait 400
Graphics processorAdreno 320Adreno 330Adreno 330
System memory
2048 MB RAM (Dual-channel, 533 MHz) / LPDDR23072 MB RAM (Dual-channel, 800 MHz) / LPDDR32048 MB RAM (Dual-channel, 800 MHz) / LPDDR3
Built-in storage32 GB32 GB32 GB
Storage expansionmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXCmicroSD, microSDHC 
CAMERA
Camera4 megapixels13 megapixels13 megapixels
FlashLEDLEDLED
Aperture sizeF2.0F2.2 
Focal length (35mm equivalent)28mm  
Camera sensor size1/3"  
Camcorder1920x1080 (1080p HD) (30 fps), 1280x720 (720p HD) (60 fps)3840x2160 (4K) (30 fps), 1920x1080 (1080p HD) (60 fps), 1280x720 (720p HD) (120 fps)1920x1080 (1080p HD) (60 fps)
FeaturesContinuous autofocus, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)Digital image stabilization, Continuous autofocusOptical image stabilization
Front-facing camera2.1 megapixels2 megapixels2.1 megapixels
Video capture1920x1080 (1080p HD) (30 fps)1920x1080 (1080p HD) (30 fps)1920x1080 (1080p HD) (30 fps)
TECHNOLOGY
CDMA
800, 1900 MHz 800, 1900 MHz
GSM850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz
UMTS850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz
FDD LTE700 (band 13), 800 (band 18), 850 (band 5), 900 (band 8), 1800 (band 3), 1900 (band 2), 2100 (band 1), 2600 (band 7) MHz700 (band 17), 800 (band 18), 850 (band 5), 900 (band 8), 1700/2100 (band 4), 1800 (band 3), 1900 (band 2) MHz850 (band 5), 900 (band 8), 1800 (band 3), 2100 (band 1), 2600 (band 7) MHz
DataLTE, HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, EV-DO Rev.ALTE Cat4 Downlink 150 Mbit/s, LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s, HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS, EDGE, GPRSLTE-A, LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s, LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s, HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, EV-DO Rev.A